ReviewCureus2022
A Review of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: Clinical Presentation and Management.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive overview: deep learning approaches to central serous chorioretinopathy diagnosis.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical and multimodal imaging characteristics of acute central serous chorioretinopathy with fibrinous exudation.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Influence of combined eplerenone, aflibercept and nepafenac therapy on central serous chorioretinopathy.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Importance of fluorescein angiography as a predictor of treatment response in patients with pachychoroid neovasculopathy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Increased oxidative stress biomarkers in central serous chorioretinopathy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) may be understood as a disease of the chorioretina with the serous detachment of the neurosensory retina, which is secondary to single or multiple localized defects in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). CSC is one of the common forms of loss of vision, usually seen in people who do belong to the working-age group. The most common symptoms are blurring of vision, usually unilateral and which is perceived as a scotoma in the center of the field of vision with associated metamorphopsia and micropsia. The risk factor associated with CSC is psychosocial stress, type A personality, pregnancy, and hypercortisolism. Normal vision is often restored within a span of a few months. After around three months, if the resolution of acute CSC did not change or, let us say, in the case of CSC that is chronic, one should consider treatment. In acute CSC, to resolve symptoms, especially in individuals who work in a field where eyesight is of utmost importance, for example, pilots, focal photocoagulation of leaking RPE lesions can be performed. CSC is a prototype cause of serous neuroretinal detachment, which involves the fovea. CSC symptoms reflect the separation between the RPE and the photoreceptors and the bullous distension of the foveal retina. The effect of therapy as such on the long-term outcome of vision visual is not sufficiently documented. The management would largely be dependent on the appropriate diagnosis made based on clinical presentations, and thus it becomes very much necessary to have knowledge about the same and counsel the patient regarding the association between stress and disease pathology. In acute CSC, retinal photocoagulation is successful to a good extent in eliminating or reducing the leakage of RPE and hence it induces resolution of the serous detachment. This review article is made to make sure the reader is updated about the various clinical and management aspects of CSC by providing a comprehensive idea that is obtained from various well-acknowledged databases across the globe on CSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.