ArticleChinese herbal medicines2020
Comparative pharmacokinetics of baicalin and geniposide in juvenile and adult rats after oral administration of Qingkailing Granules.
Article in Chinese herbal medicines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research Progress on Traditional Chinese Medicine Preparations in Respiratory Inflammatory Diseases.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Herbal Granules of Heat-Clearing and Detoxifying for Children with Mild Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effect of age on Qingkailing Granules disposition by comparing the pharmacokinetics of geniposide and baicalin in juvenile and adult rats. Methods: A simple and rapid LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated to simultaneously determine geniposide and baicalin in rat plasma after a simple protein precipitation. The analytes were separated on an Agilent ZORBAX Extend-C Results: The linear ranges of the analytes were 1-1000 ng/mL for baicalin and 2-2000 ng/mL for geniposide. The method was successfully applied to compare the pharmacokinetics of the analytes between juvenile and adult rats after oral administration of Qingkailing Granules. AUC was bigger in adult rats, while Conclusion: These results suggested that the absorption and elimination of baicalin and geniposide in juvenile rats was lower than that in adult rats. Additional attention should be paid to the pharmacokinetic difference when Qingkailing Granules were used in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.