Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36120115›Full record

ArticleACS ES&T engineering2022

An Automated Toolchain for Camera-Enabled Sensing of Drinking Water Chlorine Residual.

Alyssa Schubert, Leah Pifer, Jianzhong Cheng, Shawn P McElmurry, Branko Kerkez, Nancy G Love

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS ES&T engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alyssa SchubertDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9884-2289
Leah PiferDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Jianzhong ChengDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Shawn P McElmurryDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7398-431X
Branko KerkezDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Nancy G LoveDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9184-2451
University of Michigan · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlorine residual concentration is an important parameter to prevent pathogen growth in drinking water. Disposable color changing test strips that measure chlorine in tap water are commercially available to the public; however, the color changes are difficult to read by eye, and the data are not captured for water service providers. Here we present an automated toolchain designed to process digital images of free chlorine residual test strips taken with mobile phone cameras. The toolchain crops the image using image processing algorithms that isolate the areas relevant for analysis and automatically white balances the image to allow for use with different phones and lighting conditions. The average red, green, and blue (RGB) color values of the image are used to predict a free chlorine concentration that is classified into three concentration tiers (<0.2 mg/L, 0.2-0.5 mg/L, or >0.5 mg/L), which can be reported to water users and recorded for utility use. The proposed approach was applied to three different phone types under three different lighting conditions using a standard background. This approach can discriminate between concentrations above and below 0.5 mg/L with an accuracy of 90% and 94% for training and testing data sets, respectively. Furthermore, it can discriminate between concentrations of <0.2 mg/L, 0.2-0.5 mg/L, or >0.5 mg/L with weighted-averaged F1 scores of 79% and 88% for training and testing data sets, respectively. This tool sets the stage for tap water consumers and water utilities to gather frequent measurements and high-resolution temporal and spatial data on drinking water quality.

Identifiers

PMID36120115
PMCPMC9469768
OpenAlexW4281780628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.