ReviewACS ES&T engineering2022
Nanocomposite Polymeric Membranes for Organic Micropollutant Removal: A Critical Review.
Review in ACS ES&T engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasma-Modified ZIF-8-Incorporated PVDF Membrane for Efficient Removal of Antibiotics from Water.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Catalyst-free photodegradation of ethylparaben on surface-engineered PBT membranes: a coupled adsorption-photolysis mechanism.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Performance Evaluation of Polymeric Tubular Membranes for Wastewater from Rubber Production.Membranes · 2026Article
- Calcium Ion Mixing Modes Govern Membrane Fouling Mitigation During Membrane-Based Recovery of Extracellular Polymeric Substances.Membranes · 2025Article
- Predicting micropollutant removal through nanopore-sized membranes using several machine-learning approaches based on feature engineering.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Development of a Green Polymeric Membrane for Sodium Diclofenac Removal from Aqueous Solutions.Membranes · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of organic micropollutants (OMPs) and their persistence in water supplies have raised serious concerns for drinking water safety and public health. Conventional water treatment technologies, including adsorption and biological treatment, are known to be insufficient in treating OMPs and have demonstrated poor selectivity toward a wide range of OMPs. Pressure-driven membrane filtration has the potential to remove many OMPs detected in water with high selectivity as a membrane's molecular weight cutoff (MWCO), surface charge, and hydrophilicity can be easily tailored to a targeted OMP's size, charge and octanol-water partition coefficient (K
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.