Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36120008›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Assay Performance of a Label-Free, Solution-Phase CYFRA 21-1 Determination.

Amanda K Kussrow, Michael N Kammer, Pierre P Massion, Rebekah Webster, Darryl J Bornhop

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 64% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda K KussrowDepartment of Chemistry and The Vanderbilt Institute for Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-2066
Michael N KammerDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7912-8450
Pierre P MassionDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-0559
Rebekah WebsterDepartment of Chemistry and The Vanderbilt Institute for Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.
Darryl J BornhopDepartment of Chemistry and The Vanderbilt Institute for Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CYFRA 21.1, a cytokeratin fragment of epithelial origin, has long been a valuable blood-based biomarker. As with most biomarkers, the clinical diagnostic value of CYFRA 21.1 is dependent on the quantitative performance of the assay. Looking toward translation, it is shown here that a free-solution assay (FSA) coupled with a compensated interferometric reader (CIR) can be used to provide excellent analytical performance in quantifying CYFRA 21.1 in patient serum samples. This report focuses on the analytical performance of the high-sensitivity (hs)-CYFRA 21.1 assay in the context of quantifying the biomarker in two indeterminate pulmonary nodule (IPN) patient cohorts totaling 179 patients. Each of the ten assay calibrations consisted of 6 concentrations, each run as 7 replicates (e.g., 10 × 6 × 7 data points) and were performed on two different instruments by two different operators. Coefficients of variation (CVs) for the hs-CYFRA 21.1 analytical figures of merit, limit of quantification (LOQ) of ca. 60 pg/mL,

Identifiers

PMID36120008
PMCPMC9476196
OpenAlexW4293492837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.