ArticleACS omega2022
Identifying Transcription Factors That Prefer Binding to Methylated DNA Using Reduced
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative risk stratification for pathological upgrading in colorectal polyps using explainable machine learning: implications for screening optimization and resource allocation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Identifying the DNA methylation preference of transcription factors using ProtBERT and SVM.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- TFProtBert: Detection of Transcription Factors Binding to Methylated DNA Using ProtBert Latent Space Representation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Uncovering the roles of DNA hemi-methylation in transcriptional regulation using MspJI-assisted hemi-methylation sequencing.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- eMIC-AntiKP: Estimating minimum inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics towardsComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) play an important role in gene expression and regulation of 3D genome conformation. TFs have ability to bind to specific DNA fragments called enhancers and promoters. Some TFs bind to promoter DNA fragments which are near the transcription initiation site and form complexes that allow polymerase enzymes to bind to initiate transcription. Previous studies showed that methylated DNAs had ability to inhibit and prevent TFs from binding to DNA fragments. However, recent studies have found that there were TFs that could bind to methylated DNA fragments. The identification of these TFs is an important steppingstone to a better understanding of cellular gene expression mechanisms. However, as experimental methods are often time-consuming and labor-intensive, developing computational methods is essential. In this study, we propose two machine learning methods for two problems: (1) identifying TFs and (2) identifying TFs that prefer binding to methylated DNA targets (TFPMs). For the TF identification problem, the proposed method uses the position-specific scoring matrix for data representation and a deep convolutional neural network for modeling. This method achieved 90.56% sensitivity, 83.96% specificity, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.9596 on an independent test set. For the TFPM identification problem, we propose to use the reduced
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.