Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36119974›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Polystyrene Nanoplastic Exposure Induces Developmental Toxicity by Activating the Oxidative Stress Response and Base Excision Repair Pathway in Zebrafish (

Meilan Feng, Juanjuan Luo, Yiping Wan, Jiannan Zhang, Chunjiao Lu, Maya Wang, Lu Dai, Xiaoqian Cao, Xiaojun Yang, Yajun Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Microplastics negatively impact ecosystems, human health and cellular proteostasis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meilan FengKey Laboratory of Bio-resources and Eco-environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Juanjuan LuoKey Laboratory of Bio-resources and Eco-environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Yiping WanKey Laboratory of Bio-resources and Eco-environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Jiannan ZhangKey Laboratory of Bio-resources and Eco-environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Chunjiao LuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease and Molecular Immunopathology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China.
Maya WangKey Laboratory of Bio-resources and Eco-environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Lu DaiKey Laboratory of Bio-resources and Eco-environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Xiaoqian CaoKey Laboratory of Bio-resources and Eco-environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Xiaojun YangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease and Molecular Immunopathology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0007-3715
Yajun WangKey Laboratory of Bio-resources and Eco-environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Sichuan University · CNShantou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread accumulation of nanoplastics is a growing concern for the environmental and human health. However, studies on the mechanisms of nanoplastic-induced developmental toxicity are still limited. Here, we systematically investigated the potential biological roles of nanoplastic exposure in zebrafish during the early developmental stage. The zebrafish embryos were subjected to exposure to 100 nm polystyrene nanoplastics with different concentrations (0, 100, 200, and 400 mg/L). The results indicated that nanoplastic exposure could decrease the hatching and survival rates of zebrafish embryos. In addition, the developmental toxicity test indicated that nanoplastic exposure exhibits developmental toxicity via the inhibition of the heart rate and body length in zebrafish embryos. Besides, behavioral activity was also significantly suppressed after 96 h of nanoplastic exposure in zebrafish larvae. Further biochemical assays revealed that nanoplastic-induced activation of the oxidative stress responses, including reactive oxygen species accumulation and enhanced superoxide dismutase and catalase activities, might affect developmental toxicity in zebrafish embryos. Furthermore, a quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay demonstrated that the mRNA levels of the base excision repair (BER) pathway-related genes, including

Identifiers

PMID36119974
PMCPMC9476205
OpenAlexW4293842883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.