ArticleTremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)2022
Real-World Evidence of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation for Essential Tremor.
Article in Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Essential Tremor: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness and Safety.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Pooled it
- Peripheral nerve stimulation for essential tremor: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Movement Disorders and Smart Wrist Devices: A Comprehensive Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Short-term efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation for essential tremor in a randomized double-blind controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Non-Invasive Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy Offers Action Tremor Relief in Parkinson's Disease.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Trial
- Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Trial
- Epidemiology and Treatment of Patients with Essential Tremor: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis in the United Kingdom.Neuroepidemiology · 2026Article
- Essential Tremor and Digital Biomarkers: A Scoping Review Using the TRACE Framework to Map Readiness for Clinical Trials and Routine Practice.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Underlying Tremor Improvement with Consistent Use of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation in Patients with Essential Tremor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Current and Emerging Therapeutic Targets for Essential Tremor: A Critical Appraisal of Recent Preclinical and Clinical Studies.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Review
- Shaking Up Essential Tremor: Peripheral Devices and Mechanical Strategies to Reduce Tremor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation for Essential Tremor: Real-World Evidence with Long Term Follow-Up.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) is a prescription, wrist-worn device-delivered, non-invasive neuromodulation therapy for treatment of hand tremor in patients with essential tremor (ET). This retrospective post-market surveillance study evaluated real-world effectiveness of TAPS from patients using therapy on-demand for at least 90 days between August 2019 through June 2021. Methods: Demographics were summarized from TAPS prescriptions received from the patient's healthcare provider. Therapy usage and effectiveness were analyzed from device logs, which included tremor measurements from onboard motion sensors. Tremor history and patient-reported outcomes were assessed from a voluntary survey. Results: A total of 321 patients (average age 71 years, 32% female) met the criteria for this analysis, 216 of whom had tremor measurements available for analysis and 69 of whom completed the survey. Total usage period ranged from 90 to 663 days, with 28% of patients using the device for over one year. Patients used therapy 5.4 ± 4.5 (mean ± 1 standard deviation) times per week. TAPS reduced tremor power by 71% (geometric mean) across all sessions, with 59% of patients experiencing >50% tremor reduction after their sessions. Eighty-four percent (84%) of patients who returned the voluntary survey reported improvement in at least one of eating, drinking, or writing, and 65% of patients reported improvement in quality of life. Self-reported device-related safety complaints were consistent with adverse events in prior clinical trials. Discussion: Real-world evidence is consistent with prior clinical trials and confirms TAPS provides safe and effective tremor control for many patients with ET. Future work assessing multi-year safety and effectiveness would be valuable to extend these data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.