ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2022
Anti-seizure medication treatment trials prior to pre-surgical evaluation.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Presurgical Use of Cenobamate for Adult and Pediatric Patients Referred for Epilepsy Surgery: Expert Panel Recommendations.Neurology and therapy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Our study evaluates patterns of anti-seizure medication (ASM) usage prior to pre-surgical evaluation in drug resistant epilepsy (DRE). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with DRE presenting for pre-surgical evaluation from 1/1/2017 to 12/31/2018. We abstracted demographic data, ASM usage, MRI and EEG findings, and distance from home to our center. Results: In total, 54 patients (23 female) were included. The mean number of ASM trials at the time of pre-surgical evaluation was 5.62 (±3.3; range 1-15). A mean of 0.4 ASMs (±1.1; range 0-6) were initiated at our center prior to pre-surgical evaluation. MRI localization to regions other than the hippocampal or temporal region (p = 0.002) was associated with higher numbers of ASM trials. A trend for a larger number of ASM trials was seen for increased distance of patient primary residence from our center, right-sided ictal EEG laterality, and posterior quadrant or non-localized ictal EEG patterns. Conclusions: Only 17% of patients were referred for pre-surgical evaluation after a trial of 1-2 ASMs. On average, patients tried 5.6 different ASMs with most of those trials predating referral to our center. Temporal lobe lesions were associated with fewer ASM trials prior to referral. Female sex was associated with an average of two more ASM trials than males. Our data do not allow us to determine how access to care, patient choice, and physician opinions impact the variability of ASM trials prior to referral for surgical evaluation. Our data indicate that delays to pre-surgical evaluation continue to occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.