ArticleHeliyon2022
Advantages and disadvantages of using more sustainable ingredients in fish feed.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Alternative Protein and Lipid Sources for Rainbow Trout (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Exploring the Potential of Microalgae as Feed Ingredients for Sustainable Aquaculture: A Review of Nutritional and Environmental Benefits.Aquaculture nutrition · 2026Review
- Native oleaginous yeastsFrontiers in fungal biology · 2026Article
- Feeding for Well-Being: Porcine Blood Hydrolysate Supplementation Improves Metabolic and Welfare-Related Traits in Farmed Gilthead Sea Bream (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Synthetic Feed Attractants in European Seabass (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Growth Rate Prediction, Performance, and Biochemical Enhancement of Black Soldier Fly (Insects · 2025Article
- Evaluation ofAquaculture nutrition · 2025Article
- Locally-Sourced Animal Protein Hydrolysates in High-Plant-Protein Diets Can Promote European Seabass Growth and Nutrient Utilization, Reducing Reliance on Fishmeal.Aquaculture nutrition · 2025Article
- Feeding global aquaculture.Science advances · 2024Review
- The Application of Synthetic Flavors in Zebrafish (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Phytoestrogens as Biomarkers of Plant Raw Materials Used for Fish Feed Production.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the population grows, demand for food increases. Fish is considered to be one of the most efficient sources of protein. But as demand increases, we need to think about the efficient and sustainable fish feed. There is a need to replace existing feed ingredients such as fishmeal and fish oil with more sustainable sources of protein and oil. In 1990, fish feed consisted mainly of fishmeal and fish oil, but today's fish feed is dominated by vegetable protein and vegetable oil. Comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the alternatives is concluded that previously used fish feed ingredients such as fishmeal and fish oil are not the most efficient, sustainable, and economically viable resources. The comparison shows why the composition of fish feed has shifted from 1990 to 2020 towards the use of plant resources in fish feed, as plant resources are more efficient, sustainable, and economically viable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.