ArticleHeliyon2022
Optimal resin monomer ratios for light-cured dental resins.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiscale Design of Dental Restorative Materials: Mechanistic Foundations, Technological Innovations, and Clinical Translation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Advances in Bioactive Dental Adhesives for Caries Prevention: A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Evaluation of Six Flowable Composite Resins in the Market: A Comparative Study.Frontiers in dentistry · 2025Article
- Comparison of Fracture Strength of Milled and 3D-Printed Crown Materials According to Occlusal Thickness.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Polymer Mixtures for Experimental Self-Limited Dental Burs Development-A Preliminary Approach (Part 1).Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monomer ratios play a crucial role on the performances of dental resins, the optimal monomer ratios for dental resins are determined by combining the degree of conversion (DC), rate of polymerization (Rp), and mechanical properties, based on commonly-used Bis-GMA (bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate), UDMA (urethane dimethacrylate), and TEGDMA (triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate) resins. The DC and mechanical properties of the dental resins are examined by NIR (Near Infrared Ray) spectroscopy and nanoindentation tests, respectively. The results indicate that the Rp increases while the DC decreases with the loading content of Bis-GMA or UDMA in dental resins (i.e., Bis-GMA/TEGDMA and UDMA/TEGDMA). Meanwhile, both elastic modulus and hardness also present a tendency to increase. Various different monomers maybe create a strong polymer matrix in proper proportions, comprehensively comparing the performances of dental resins in different monomer ratios, the cured resins containing Bis-GMA (15-35 wt%), UDMA (37-60 wt%) and TEGDMA (20-35 wt%) show better material properties. The present study offers a quantitative analysis for Bis-GMA/UDMA/TEGDMA dental resins as well as provides guidance for the research of dental resins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.