Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36119847›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cancer research2022

A review of studies on omitting surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Kexin Feng, Ziqi Jia, Gang Liu, Zeyu Xing, Jiayi Li, Jiaxin Li, Fei Ren, Jiang Wu, Wenyan Wang, Jie Wang and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Extent of resection in breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a literature review.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kexin FengDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Ziqi JiaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Gang LiuDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Zeyu XingDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Jiayi LiDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Jiaxin LiDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Fei RenDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Jiang WuDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Wenyan WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing 100070, China.
Jie WangDepartment of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Jiaqi LiuDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Xiang WangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNBeijing Tian Tan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advancement in systemic neoadjuvant therapy has significantly increased the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in breast cancer. As surgeries inevitably affect patients physically and psychologically and the accuracy of pCR prediction and diagnosis by minimal invasive biopsy is improving, the necessity of surgery in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) patients who achieve pCR is under debate. Thus, we conducted a literature review of studies on the selective omission of breast surgery after NAC for breast cancer patients. We summarized the existing predictive models and technologies to predict and diagnose pCR after NAC. Our research indicates that, for nearly half a century, the extent of surgery on both breast and axillary lymph nodes is decreasing, while more precise systematic treatments are increasing. NAC has advanced significantly and its pCR rates have improved, so surgery may be omitted in certain patients. However, accurately predicting pCR after NAC is still a challenge. We also described the design for a randomized clinical trial and the potential problems of omitting surgical treatment after NAC. In summary, the decrease in breast cancer surgery is an unavoidable trend, and more high-quality clinical trials need to be conducted.

Indexed as

Breast cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapypathological complete responsesurgery

Identifiers

PMID36119847
PMCPMC9442028
OpenAlexW4296329608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.