Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36119818›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022

Combination of preoperative plasma fibrinogen and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to predict the prognosis for patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

Jinliang Ni, Yidi Wang, Haixian Zhang, Keyi Wang, Wei Song, Ming Luo, Jianping Che, Jiang Geng, Yunfei Xu, Xudong Yao and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jinliang NiDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Putuo District People's Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200062, China.
Yidi WangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Putuo District People's Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200062, China.
Haixian ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Shanghai 200000, China.
Keyi WangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Putuo District People's Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200062, China.
Wei SongShanghai Clinical College, Anhui Medical University Shanghai 200072, China.
Ming LuoDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University Shanghai 200072, China.
Jianping CheDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University Shanghai 200072, China.
Jiang GengDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University Shanghai 200072, China.
Yunfei XuDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University Shanghai 200072, China.
Xudong YaoDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University Shanghai 200072, China.
Junhua ZhengDepartment of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200000, China.
Ming ChenDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Bo PengDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Putuo District People's Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200062, China.
Weipu MaoDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Putuo District People's Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200062, China.
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNZhongda Hospital Southeast University · CNRenji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the prognostic significance of a combination of fibrinogen and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) named the F-NLR score as a novel indicator and further create nomograms for predicting the prognosis of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with laparoscopic nephrectomy. A total of 425 patients with RCC who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy were included in this study. Then, we divided the patients based on the cut-off values of their F-NLR score into three categories: F-NLR 2 (both high fibrinogen and NLR), F-NLR 0 (both low fibrinogen and NLR), and F-NLR 1 (remaining patients). Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the predictive performance of the F-NLR score on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Predictive nomograms of F-NLR were established and internally validated. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the predictive accuracy of the nomogram, NLR, and fibrinogen as prognostic markers. The F-NLR 0, 1, and 2 groups included 226 (53.2%), 147 (34.6%), and 52 (12.2%) patients, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that a high F-NLR score was significantly associated with poor prognosis and acted as an independent prognostic factor for OS and CSS (all

Indexed as

F-NLR scorelaparoscopic nephrectomyprognostic biomarkerrenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID36119818
PMCPMC9442019
OpenAlexW4296330408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.