ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022
A novel risk model based on immune response predicts clinical outcomes and characterizes immunophenotypes in triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A time-dependent model for quantifying postoperative inflammatory trajectories and predicting survival in early triple-negative breast cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Integrating mitochondrial and lysosomal gene analysis for breast cancer prognosis using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is highly heterogeneous in prognosis. The current TNM staging system shows its limitation in accurate risk evaluation. Immune response and immune cell abundances in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) are critical for cancer progression, clinical outcome and therapeutic response in TNBC. However, there is a lack of an effective risk model based on the overall transcriptional alterations relevant to different immune responses. In this study, multiple bioinformatics and statistical approaches were used to develop an immune-related risk (IRR) signature based on the differentially expressed genes between the immune-active and immune-inactive samples. The IRR model showed great performance in risk stratification, immune landscape evaluation and immunotherapy response prediction. Compared with the low-IRR group, the high-IRR group exhibited a poorer prognosis, less cytotoxic cell infiltration, higher M2/M1 ratio and upregulated glycolytic activity. Moreover, the high-IRR group showed more resistance to immunotherapy than the low-IRR group. Our study reveals that the IRR model may be a promising tool to help clinicians assess risk and optimize treatment for TNBC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36119814PMC9442003W4296328732What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.