Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36119776›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency medicine2022

Development and evaluation of a predictive nomogram for survival in heat stroke patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Fei Shao, Xian Shi, Shu-Hua Huo, Qing-Yu Liu, Ji-Xue Shi, Jian Kang, Ping Gong, Sheng-Tao Yan, Guo-Xing Wang, Li-Jie Qin and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Fei ShaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Xian ShiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Huairou Hospital, Beijing 101400, China.
Shu-Hua HuoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China.
Qing-Yu LiuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hebei Yanda Hospital, Langfang 065201, China.
Ji-Xue ShiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an 271000, China.
Jian KangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China.
Ping GongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China.
Sheng-Tao YanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
Guo-Xing WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100050, China.
Li-Jie QinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, China.
Fei WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changung Hospital, Beijing 102218, China.
Ke FengDepartment of Emergency Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China.
Feng-Ying ChenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, China.
Yong-Jie YinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
Tao MaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.
Yan LiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China.
Yang WuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Hao CuiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Chang-Xiao YuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Song YangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Huairou Hospital, Beijing 101400, China.
Wei GanDepartment of Big Data Research, Goodwill Hessian Health Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100085, China.
Sai WangDepartment of Big Data Research, Goodwill Hessian Health Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100085, China.
Liu-Ye-Zi DuDepartment of Big Data Research, Goodwill Hessian Health Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100085, China.
Ming-Chen ZhaoSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China.
Zi-Ren TangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Shen ZhaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to establish an effective nomogram to predict the survival of heat stroke (HS) based on risk factors.

methodsThis was a retrospective, observational multicenter cohort study. We analyzed patients diagnosed with HS, who were treated between May 1 and September 30, 2018 at 15 tertiary hospitals from 11 cities in Northern China.

resultsAmong the 175 patients, 32 patients (18.29%) died before hospital discharge. After the univariate analysis, mechanical ventilation, initial mean arterial pressure <70 mmHg, maximum heart rate, lab results on day 1 (white blood cell count, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine), and Glasgow admission prediction score were included in multivariate analysis. Multivariate Cox regression showed that invasive ventilation, initial mean arterial pressure <70 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), and Glasgow admission prediction score were independent risk factors for HS. The nomogram was established for predicting 7-d and 14-d survival in the training cohort. The nomogram exhibited a concordance index (C-index) of 0.880 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.831-0.930) by bootstrapping validation (B=1,000). Furthermore, the nomogram performed better when predicting 14-d survival, compared to 7-d survival. The prognostic index cut-off value was set at 2.085, according to the operating characteristic curve for overall survival prediction. The model showed good calibration ability in the internal and external validation datasets.

conclusionA novel nomogram, integrated with prognostic factors, was proposed; it was highly predictive of the survival in HS patients.

Indexed as

Heat strokeNomogramPrognosisSurvival

Identifiers

PMID36119776
PMCPMC9420659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.