Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36119666›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Efficacy of a multiple-component and multifactorial personalized fall prevention program in a mixed population of community-dwelling older adults with stroke, Parkinson's Disease, or frailty compared to usual care: The PRE.C.I.S.A. randomized controlled trial.

Fabio La Porta, Giada Lullini, Serena Caselli, Franco Valzania, Chiara Mussi, Claudio Tedeschi, Giulio Pioli, Massimo Bondavalli, Marco Bertolotti, Federico Banchelli and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03592420 (Efficacy of a Multifactorial and Personalized Program for Fall Prevention in Community-dwelling Elderly in Comparison to the Usual Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03592420 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of a Multifactorial and Personalized Program for Fall Prevention in Community-dwelling Elderly in Comparison to the Usual Care: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di ModenaRan2014 to 2017Enrolled366ConditionsFall, Aging, Parkinson Disease, StrokeArmsInterdisciplinary multicomponent interventions, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effects of a gait training program with the FisiorBMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026
    Trial
  5. Qualitative assessment of mobility in older adults: a scoping review of process-oriented behavioural criteria.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Fabio La PortaIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giada LulliniIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Serena CaselliRehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Franco ValzaniaAzienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Chiara MussiRehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Claudio TedeschiAzienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Giulio PioliAzienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Massimo BondavalliAzienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Marco BertolottiRehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Federico BanchelliRehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Roberto D'AmicoRehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Roberto ViciniRehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Silvia PuglisiRehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Pierina Viviana ClericiRehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Lorenzo ChiariDepartment of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi" (DEI), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
PRECISA Group
Policlinico di Modena · ITAzienda Ospedaliera S.Maria · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fall risk in the elderly is a major public health issue due to the injury-related consequences and the risk of associated long-term disability. However, delivering preventive interventions in usual clinical practice still represents a challenge. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of a multiple-component combined with a multifactorial personalized intervention in reducing fall rates in a mixed population of community-dwelling elderly compared to usual care. Design: Randomized Controlled Trial (NCT03592420, clinicalTrials.gov). Setting: Outpatients in two Italian centers. Population: 403 community-dwelling elderly at moderate-to-high fall risk, including subjects with Parkinson's Disease and stroke. Methods: After the randomization, the described interventions were administered to the intervention group ( Results: 690 falls were reported at 12 months, 48.8% in the intervention and 51.2% in the control group, with 1.66 (± 3.5) and 1.77 (± 3.2) mean falls per subject, respectively. Subjects with ≥ 1 fall and ≥2 falls were, respectively, 236 (58.6%) and 148 (36.7%). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups regarding the number of falls, the falling probability, and the time to the first fall. According to the subgroup analysis, no significant differences were reported. However, a statistically significant difference was found for the Mini-BESTest ( Conclusions: The intervention was ineffective in reducing the number of falls, the falling probability, and the time to the first fall at 12 months in a mixed population of community-dwelling elderly. A significant improvement for two balance indicators was recorded in the intervention group. Future studies are needed to explore different effects of the proposed interventions to reduce falls and consequences.

Indexed as

accidental fallsfrail elderlyindependent livingParkinson's Diseaseprimary preventionrandomized controlled trialrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID36119666
PMCPMC9475118
OpenAlexW4294025668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.