Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36119649›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience and behavioral physiology2022

COVID-19-Associated Stroke.

I A Shchukin, M S Fidler, I A Koltsov, A Yu Suvorov

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience and behavioral physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

I A ShchukinPirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia.
M S FidlerPirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia.
I A KoltsovPirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia.
A Yu SuvorovFederal Center for the Brain and Neurotechnology, Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RUFederal Medical-Biological Agency · RUMinistry of Health of the Russian Federation · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant influences on the incidence of acute cerebrovascular accidents and the structure of mortality. SARS-CoV-2 increases the risks of developing both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. The key pathogenetic element underlying the development of cerebral stroke in COVID-19 consists of impairments to the operation of angiotensin 2 receptors, which are accompanied by accumulation of excess quantities of angiotensin 2, endothelial dysfunction, hypercoagulation, overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines, and an oxidative storm. In patients with stroke and COVID-19, lesion severity is associated with dual mechanisms of ischemia - systemic and cerebral. The possibilities of medication-based correction of both systemic impairments associated with coronavirus infection and local impairments due to ischemic or hemorrhagic brain damage, are limited. Substances with antioxidant activity may potentially be effective in patients with stroke and COVID-19. Data from a number of clinical rials indicate that Mexidol significantly improves functional outcomes in ischemic stroke. Use of Mexidol in patients with stroke and COVID-19 is advised.

Indexed as

angiotensin receptorscoronavirus infectioncytokine stormischemic strokeMexidoloxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID36119649
PMCPMC9468522
OpenAlexW4296329049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.