ReviewCanadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR2022
A longitudinal study on the impact of simulation on positive deviance through speaking up.
Review in Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring Students' Perceptions and Experiences of Raising Concerns During Pre-Registration Training in England: A Systematic Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Students reported positive learning outcomes during a simulation study addressing compliance and speaking up. Purpose: Investigate if the impacts of the simulation had a lasting effect on participants after moving into practice. Method: Semi-structured interviews focusing on memory of the study, psychological impacts, educational impacts, professional impacts, and experiences in practice were conducted with Advanced Care Paramedics (3) and Respiratory Therapists (7) between 19 and 24 months after the original study. Discussion: Participants indicated the simulation helped them develop the skill and confidence to speak up, preparing them to speak up in practice. Primary findings included: ( Conclusions: Simulation for speaking up should occur early. Conducting high-impact simulations for speaking up is a practical and actionable intervention that appears to enhance confidence, ability, and likelihood of speaking up in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.