ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
The safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with non-tube nofasting fast-track surgery for esophageal carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and feasibility of early oral feeding following hand-sewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in ESCC.Future science OA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our non-tube no fasting (early oral feeding and no nasogastric tube) fast-track surgery (FTS) was safe and effective to combine with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy. In addition, the two groups were similar in terms of the recovery time, hospital discharge day, and early resumption of oral feeding. Objectives: To evaluate the safety of early oral feeding (EOF) combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) of esophagectomy. Summary Background Data: Our non-tube no fasting (early oral feeding and no nasogastric tube) fast-track surgery (FTS) was safe and effective for primary surgery esophageal cancer patients. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent non-tube no fasting and McKeown minimally invasive (MIE). They were divided into two groups: one received NAC, and the other received primary surgery. Complications after the operation, postoperative CRG complications, operative time, operative bleeding, and length of stay were evaluated. Results: Between 01/2014 and 12/2017, there hundred and eighty two consecutive patients underwent MIE with total two-field lymphadenectomy under the non-tube no fasting fast-track surgery program. A total of 137 patients received NAC, and 245 accepted primary surgery. Propensity score matching was used to compare NAC patients with 62 matched patients from each group. The NAC group had a similar number of total complications as the primary surgery group (32.26% in the primary surgery group vs. 25.81% in the NAC group; p=0.429) and had the same median postoperative hospitalization duration (8 days, p=0.723). Conclusions: After McKeown MIE, the patients receiving NAC combined with "non-tube no fasting" FTS had a similar incidence of postoperative complications outcomes as those without NAC. In addition, the two groups were similar in terms of the recovery time, hospital discharge day, and early resumption of oral feeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.