Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36119507›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Ultrasomics prediction for cytokeratin 19 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study.

Linlin Zhang, Qinghua Qi, Qian Li, Shanshan Ren, Shunhua Liu, Bing Mao, Xin Li, Yuejin Wu, Lanling Yang, Luwen Liu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Linlin ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Qinghua QiDepartment of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Qian LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Henan Provincial Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Shanshan RenDepartment of Ultrasound, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Shunhua LiuHenan Engineering Technology Research Center of Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging and Nanotechnology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Bing MaoHenan Engineering Technology Research Center of Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging and Nanotechnology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Xin LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuejin WuDepartment of Ultrasound, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Lanling YangDepartment of Ultrasound, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Luwen LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Yaqiong LiHenan Engineering Technology Research Center of Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging and Nanotechnology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Shaobo DuanHenan Engineering Technology Research Center of Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging and Nanotechnology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Lianzhong ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhengzhou University · CNHenan Cancer Hospital · CNHenan Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the preoperative prediction of Cytokeratin (CK) 19 expression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by machine learning-based ultrasomics. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 214 patients with pathologically confirmed HCC who received CK19 immunohistochemical staining. Through random stratified sampling (ratio, 8:2), patients from institutions I and II were divided into training dataset (n = 143) and test dataset (n = 36), and patients from institution III served as external validation dataset (n = 35). All gray-scale ultrasound images were preprocessed, and then the regions of interest were then manually segmented by two sonographers. A total of 1409 ultrasomics features were extracted from the original and derived images. Next, the intraclass correlation coefficient, variance threshold, mutual information, and embedded method were applied to feature dimension reduction. Finally, the clinical model, ultrasonics model, and combined model were constructed by eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithm. Model performance was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Results: A total of 12 ultrasomics signatures were used to construct the ultrasomics models. In addition, 21 clinical features were used to construct the clinical model, including gender, age, Child-Pugh classification, hepatitis B surface antigen/hepatitis C virus antibody (positive/negative), cirrhosis (yes/no), splenomegaly (yes/no), tumor location, tumor maximum diameter, tumor number, alpha-fetoprotein, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, glutamyl-transpeptidase, albumin, total bilirubin, conjugated bilirubin, creatinine, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, and international normalized ratio. The AUC of the ultrasomics model was 0.789 (0.621 - 0.907) and 0.787 (0.616 - 0.907) in the test and validation datasets, respectively. However, the performance of the combined model covering clinical features and ultrasomics signatures improved significantly. Additionally, the AUC (95% CI), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.867 (0.712 - 0.957), 0.750, 0.875, 0.861, and 0.862 (0.703 - 0.955), 0.833, 0.862, and 0.857 in the test dataset and external validation dataset, respectively. Conclusion: Ultrasomics signatures could be used to predict the expression of CK19 in HCC patients. The combination of clinical features and ultrasomics signatures showed excellent effects, which significantly improved prediction accuracy and robustness.

Indexed as

cytokeratin 19 (CK19)hepatocellular carcinomamachine learningradiomicsultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36119507
PMCPMC9478580
OpenAlexW4294190575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.