SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022
Diagnostic performance of radiomics in adrenal masses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of Machine Learning Models Based on Medical Imaging in Predicting Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Performance in Image-Based Cancer Identification: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Quality and accuracy of radiomics models in predicting KRAS status in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Predictive performance of radiomics for peritoneal metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis and radiomics quality assessment.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Radiomic Characterization of Adrenal Incidentalomas on NECT: Retrospective Exploratory Study and Systematic Review.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- [Modern trends in the radiological diagnostics of adrenal tumors].Problemy endokrinologii · 2026Article
- AI-enabled precision evaluation of adrenal masses: radiomics, deep learning, and explainable imaging biomarkers.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Using interpretable rule-learning artificial intelligence to optimally differentiate adrenal pheochromocytomas from adenomas with CT radiomics.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Differentiating between adrenocortical carcinoma and pheochromocytoma by a CT-based radiomics model: a multicenter retrospective study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Radiomics Results for Adrenal Mass Characterization Are Stable and Reproducible Under Different Software.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multi-model radiomics and machine learning for differentiating lipid-poor adrenal adenomas from metastases using automatic segmentation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The value of CT texture analysis in predicting mitotic activity and morphological variants of adrenocortical carcinoma.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
- Prediction of 2-[Cancers · 2023Article
- An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Feasibility study of computed tomography texture analysis for evaluation of canine primary adrenal gland tumors.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Radiomics features of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for predicting response to transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence and radiomics applications in adrenal lesions: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: (1) To assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of radiomics studies investigating the diagnostic performance in adrenal masses and (2) to determine the potential diagnostic value of radiomics in adrenal tumors by quantitative analysis. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible literature. Methodological quality and risk of bias in the included studies were assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS). The diagnostic performance was evaluated by pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC). Spearman's correlation coefficient and subgroup analysis were used to investigate the cause of heterogeneity. Publication bias was examined using the Deeks' funnel plot. Results: Twenty-eight studies investigating the diagnostic performance of radiomics in adrenal tumors were identified, with a total of 3579 samples. The average RQS was 5.11 (14.2% of total) with an acceptable inter-rater agreement (ICC 0.94, 95% CI 0.93-0.95). The risk of bias was moderate according to the result of QUADAS-2. Nine studies investigating the use of CT-based radiomics in differentiating malignant from benign adrenal tumors were included in the quantitative analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC with 95% confidence intervals were 0.80 (0.68-0.88), 0.83 (0.73-0.90), 19.06 (7.87-46.19) and 0.88 (0.85-0.91), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity among the included studies but no threshold effect in the meta-analysis. The result of subgroup analysis demonstrated that radiomics based on unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT possessed higher diagnostic performance, and second-order or higher-order features could enhance the diagnostic sensitivity but also increase the false positive rate. No significant difference in diagnostic ability was observed between studies with machine learning and those without. Conclusions: The methodological quality and risk of bias of studies investigating the diagnostic performance of radiomics in adrenal tumors should be further improved in the future. CT-based radiomics has the potential benefits in differentiating malignant from benign adrenal tumors. The heterogeneity between the included studies was a major limitation to obtaining more accurate conclusions. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ CRD 42022331999 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.