Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36119397›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2022

Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Candidemia Associated With Severe COVID-19.

Deepali Dixit, Polly Jen, Tyler D Maxwell, Steven Smoke, James Andrew McCracken, Maria Cardinale-King, Aditi Haribhakti, Purvi Patel, Eris Cani, Seohyun Claudia Choi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Clinical Characteristics of Bloodstream Infections Due toJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Deepali DixitErnest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ.
Polly JenNewark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, NJ.
Tyler D MaxwellTouro College of Pharmacy, New York, NY.
Steven SmokeCooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ.
James Andrew McCrackenErnest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ.
Maria Cardinale-KingErnest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ.
Aditi HaribhaktiErnest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ.
Purvi PatelDivision of Infectious Disease, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Eris CaniTouro College of Pharmacy, New York, NY.
Seohyun Claudia ChoiUniversity of Washington, School of Pharmacy, Seattle, WA.
Sugeet JagpalDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Tilly VarugheseDivision of Infectious Disease, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Luis L TatemSUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY.
Tanaya BhowmickDivision of Infectious Disease, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USTouro College · USJohnson University · USNewark Beth Israel Medical Center · USSaint Barnabas Medical Center · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 can cause serious illness requiring multimodal treatment and is associated with secondary infections. Studies have suggested an increased risk of fungal infections, including candidemia following severe COVID-19 though understanding of risk factors and clinical outcomes remains unclear.

objectivesTo describe clinical characteristics, outcomes and risk factors of candidemia among patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. DESIGN SETTING AND

participantsA multicenter, case-control study of patients with severe COVID-19 was conducted to evaluate risk factors and clinical outcomes in patients who developed candidemia between August 2020 and August 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Chart review evaluating institutional and patient demographics, clinical and mycological characteristics, concomitant interventions (antibiotics, immunosuppressive agents, parenteral nutrition, degree of oxygen support, mechanical ventilation, surgery), treatment regimens, and outcomes (length of stay and discharge disposition).

resultsA total of 275 patients were enrolled in the study, including 91 patients with severe COVID-19 and subsequent candidemia and 184 with severe COVID-19 without candidemia. Most patients received antibiotics prior to candidemia episode (93%), while approximately one-quarter of patients received biologic for COVID-19. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the cases compared with the controls (68% vs 40%; CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Candidemia following COVID-19 infection is a concern that requires clinical consideration and patient monitoring. Risk factors for the development of candidemia in the setting of COVID-19 infection are largely consistent with traditional risk factors for candidemia in hospitalized patients.

Indexed as

candidemiaco-infectionCOVID-19severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection

Identifiers

PMID36119397
PMCPMC9473786
OpenAlexW4295836104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.