Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36119396›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2022

Receipt of Recovery-Oriented Care Practices During Hospitalization for Sepsis.

Megan A Watson, Clare Anderson, Kevin J Karlic, Cainnear K Hogan, Sarah Seelye, Stephanie P Taylor, Hallie C Prescott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Megan A WatsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Clare AndersonUniversity of Michigan Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Kevin J KarlicDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Cainnear K HoganVA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
Sarah SeelyeVA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
Stephanie P TaylorDepartment of Internal Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Hallie C PrescottDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survivors of sepsis hospitalization are at high risk for postsepsis morbidity, readmission, and death, but these negative outcomes can be mitigated by receipt of recommended care practices. We sought to assess factors associated with the receipt of recommended recovery-oriented care practices during hospitalization for sepsis. We hypothesized that patients treated in the ICU may be more likely than ward-treated patients to receive recommended care practices given the increasing focus on survivorship in the critical care field.

designObservational cohort study.

settingMichigan Medicine, a tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult patients discharged alive from a hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock in 2019. We further limited our cohort to patients receiving longitudinal care viewable in the Michigan Medicine electronic health record to ensure ability to capture posthospital care and outcomes.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThree-hundred sixty-five sepsis hospitalizations met study inclusion criteria. Using structured chart review, we determined receipt of the following recovery-based care practices during hospitalization: medication optimization, functional status evaluation at discharge, sepsis education, and scheduled follow-up within 2 weeks. The cohort was 46.6% female, 81.1% White, with a median age of 64 years. 51.2% were treated in the ICU. Medication optimization occurred in 93.7%, functional status evaluation in 82.7%, sepsis education in 20.0%, and scheduled follow-up within 2 weeks in 54.5%. ICU-treated patients had lower receipt of medication optimization and follow-up scheduling but greater receipt of functional and mental health status evaluations. In multivariable models, ICU treatment was associated with lower odds of receiving medication optimization (adjusted odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.03-0.69) and not associated with receipt of other care practices.

conclusionsOur study shows incomplete receipt of recommended recovery-based care practices during sepsis hospitalization in both ward and ICU-treated patients. Sepsis education and mental health evaluation were particularly uncommon.

Identifiers

PMID36119396
PMCPMC9473794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.