ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Assessment of mental health status among adolescents in Puducherry, India - A mixed method study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nutritional status and behaviour difficulties among adolescent girls in a rural area of Ludhiana - A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Impact of Behavioral Activation Therapy on Neurobiological Markers of Depression in Adolescents: A Pilot Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of School Adolescents Mental health Assessment Tool (SAMAT).Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Mindfulness, teacher mental health, and well-being in early education: a correlational study.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Gaming among female adolescents: profiling and psychopathological characteristics in the Indian context.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Adolescence is a crucial period during which biological and psychosocial changes occur in an individual. The prevalence of mental disorders among Indian adolescents was 7.3%. Early recognition and intervention will help to have favorable outcomes. Aims: To determine and compare the prevalence and risk factors associated with mental health illness among urban and rural adolescents in Puducherry. Methods and Material: An explanatory mixed-method design wherein the quantitative phase (an analytical cross-sectional study) was followed by qualitative phase (focus group discussion). Adolescents aged 13-17 years attending Government schools in urban and rural Puducherry were selected by stratified random sampling. Mental health status was screened using a validated Youth Report Measures for Children and Adolescents - SDQ and students with higher score were considered to be at risk of mental health illness. Results: Among 329 adolescent, 25.5% are found to be at risk of mental health illness. The mean total score and sub-domain scores of hyperactivity and emotional symptoms were found to be significantly higher in urban when compared to rural. Among those at risk of mental health illness, significant difference between urban and rural area was seen with respect to variables like family monthly income and parent's occupation. Behaviour change and deterioration in academic performance were the most common presentation as perceived by the teachers. Conclusions: One fourth of the adolescents were found to be at risk of mental health illness, so periodic screening could be done at schools, for early identification and proper treatment of mental disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.