ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Knowledge and attitude towards emergency department utilization in Riyadh.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in Emergency Department utilization by disease categories in a migrant-dense high-income setting: a retrospective study in Dubai, 2021-2025.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Why do patients seek emergency care for problems that could be managed in primary care? A scoping review.Family practice · 2025Article
- Breaking the Emergency Room Cycle: The Impact of Telemedicine on Emergency Department Utilization.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Because the emergency department (ED) is such an important element of health care, efficient usage must be taken into account while planning and creating the scope of service for emergency care. Our study's goal is to assess the participants' knowledge and attitude towards ED. Concerns among the general public over the use of emergency rooms (ER). Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out among the sample of Saudi Arabia's population of Riyadh City in the year 2020. There were 440 people who responded. The information was gathered with a self-administered questionnaire. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 was used to analyze the data. Results: As a result of the findings, 22 symptoms were reported as the cause of ER visits, ranging from acute, urgent, and cold symptoms. Of these, 45.7% of those polled said they visited an ER if they get sick, then seek primary care, online consultation, and community pharmacy, which was 28.2%, 17.5%, and 8.6%, respectively. Around 14.32% of the visitors had a chronic condition, with asthma accounting for 41.3%, diabetes for 23.8%, and hypertension for 11.1%. In terms of the frequency of visits, 66.4% said they visit the emergency care once in every 3-6 months, and 47.7% said they visit once in a month. With a mean score of 16.16 ± 3.02/high in knowledge, the results revealed that the participants possessed a high degree of knowledge, with a significant difference among married group ( Conclusions: Because there were characteristics connected to population knowledge, limited hours, and ED overutilization without necessity, the findings of our study could be valuable in understanding the reasons for ED overutilization without necessity. In Riyadh's primary health care centers (PHCCs), there are limited medical resources. Thus, we recommend that the primary health care (PHC) admission process should be improved putting in place a triage mechanism that determines the best location for patient care that is suited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.