ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Association of long and short interpregnancy intervals with maternal outcomes.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postpartum integration of infant vaccines and contraception through gender transformative programming: A cluster randomized trial in India.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes according to maternal age in the context of China's two-child policy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- The prevalence of short inter-pregnancy interval and its associated risk factors among women attending primary health care centers of NGHA in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Predicting adverse birth outcome among childbearing women in Sub-Saharan Africa: employing innovative machine learning techniques.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Perinatal outcomes and predictors of placental abruption: a retrospective study in an Ethiopian tertiary care center.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Interbirth interval and maternal anaemia in 21 sub-Saharan African countries: A fractional-polynomial analysis.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interpregnancy interval (IPI) is spacing between live birth and beginning a new pregnancy. Both long and short IPIs have been associated with adverse maternal outcomes. There is paucity in the Indian literature regarding the impact of IPI on maternal outcomes. Materials and Methodology: The cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, from July 2019 to June 2020. Women with previous abortions, previous stillbirth, nulliparity, or multiple pregnancies were excluded. A pre-structured pro forma was used for demographic details. IPI was categorized as <6 months, 6 to <24 months, 24 to <60 months, and 60 months. Maternal outcomes were studied, and odds ratios were calculated. Results: There were 6984 deliveries in the period. A total of 4812 women were enrolled after following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of 4812 women, 142 (2.9%) had IPI <6 months, 3336/4812 women (69.3%) had IPI 6 to <24 months, 1144/4812 women (23.7%) had IPI 24 to <60 months, and 3.9% women (190/4812) had IPI ≥60 months. High risk of fetal malposition (OR 3.84), fetal growth restriction (OR 2.06), and hypertension (OR 1.86) were seen in women with short IPI <6 months. Women with longer IPI (≥ 60 months) had higher chances of preterm labor (OR 3.82), oligoamnios (OR 2.54), gestational diabetes (OR 2.19), and anemia (OR 1.45). Conclusion: Three-fourths of women had IPI less than 24 months recommended as minimum interval by WHO. Efforts are needed to increase awareness and availability of contraceptive choices for postpartum women to ensure adequate spacing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.