ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Scrub Typhus in Paediatric Age Group at a Tertiary Care Centre of Eastern India: Clinical, Biochemical Profile and Complications.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and laboratory indicators of severe scrub typhus in adults: Insights from a retrospective study in a teaching hospital in South India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Frequency and distribution of eschar in patients with scrub typhus in India: systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.Le infezioni in medicina · 2024Review
- Scrub Typhus in Children: A Prospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern India.Cureus · 2023Article
- Validation of the Scrub Typhus Encephalitis Assessment Tool for the Management of Acute Encephalitis Syndrome.Journal of global infectious diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Scrub typhus is a reemerging zoonosis, which presents as acute febrile illness. Very few paediatric prospective studies on this disease are reported from Eastern India. This prospective observational study was carried out to study the clinical presentation, diagnosis, complications and immediate outcome of Scrub typhus in paediatric population in a tertiary care hospital from Eastern India. Material and Methods: Totally 209 cases between 1 month and 18 years of age were included. Clinical manifestations, laboratory parameters and immediate outcome of all patients were recorded. All the data were collected and plotted in Microsoft Excel master chart. Continuous data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and categorical data as frequency and percentage. All the data analysis was performed using statistical software IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Results: Highest number of cases (41.1%) were found between 1 year and 5 years age group. Fever was the presenting complaint in all cases. Other common symptoms were cough (34%), pain abdomen (23.4%), vomiting (23%), seizure (11.5%) and altered sensorium (9.6%). Hepatomegaly was found in 56.5% and splenomegaly in 39.7% cases. Eschar was found in 27.3% cases. C-reactive protein was elevated (>10 mg/L) in 93.3% children. Other complications were pneumonitis (20.6%), meningoencephalitis (12.4%), septic shock (8.6%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (5.7%), myocarditis (4.8%) and acute kidney injury (4.3%). Mortality was low (1%). Conclusion: Scrub typhus is not uncommon in paediatric population and it must be considered as a close differential diagnosis of any acute febrile illness even when classical clinical presentations are not found. Early treatment results in favourable outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.