Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36119136›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular bioengineering2022

A Versatile Micromanipulation Apparatus for Biophysical Assays of the Cell Nucleus.

Marilena L Currey, Viswajit Kandula, Ronald Biggs, John F Marko, Andrew D Stephens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How the chromatin landscape influences nuclear morphology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. DNA density is a better indicator of a nuclear bleb than lamin B loss.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marilena L CurreyBiology Department, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, USA.
Viswajit KandulaDepartment of Molecular Biosciences and Department of Physics & Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA.
Ronald BiggsDepartment of Molecular Biosciences and Department of Physics & Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA.
John F MarkoDepartment of Molecular Biosciences and Department of Physics & Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA.
Andrew D StephensBiology Department, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5474-7845

Funding

Center for 3D Structure and Physics of the GenomeUM1HG011536 · NHGRI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI DEKKER, JOB, MIRNY, LEONID A · 2020 to 2024
$11.8M
Activities of nucleoprotein complexes visualized in single-molecule experimentsR01GM105847 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MARKO, JOHN F · 2013 to 2025
$2.5M
Micromechanical basis of meiotic chromosome condensation and architectureR01GM135549 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI QIAO, HUANYU · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
Analyzing the role of chromatin compaction in nuclear mechanics, structure, and functionR00GM123195 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI STEPHENS, ANDREW DANIEL · 2020 to 2022
$745k
NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG011536NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM123195NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105847NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intro: Force measurements of the nucleus, the strongest organelle, have propelled the field of mechanobiology to understand the basic mechanical components of the nucleus and how these components properly support nuclear morphology and function. Micromanipulation force measurement provides separation of the relative roles of nuclear mechanical components chromatin and lamin A. Methods: To provide access to this technique, we have developed a universal micromanipulation apparatus for inverted microscopes. We outline how to engineer and utilize this apparatus through dual micromanipulators, fashion and calibrate micropipettes, and flow systems to isolate a nucleus and provide force vs. extensions measurements. This force measurement approach provides the unique ability to measure the separate contributions of chromatin at short extensions and lamin A strain stiffening at long extensions. We then investigated the apparatus' controllable and programmable micromanipulators through compression, isolation, and extension in conjunction with fluorescence to develop new assays for nuclear mechanobiology. Results: Using this methodology, we provide the first rebuilding of the micromanipulation setup outside of its lab of origin and recapitulate many key findings including spring constant of the nucleus and strain stiffening across many cell types. Furthermore, we have developed new micromanipulation-based techniques to compress nuclei inducing nuclear deformation and/or rupture, track nuclear shape post-isolation, and fluorescence imaging during micromanipulation force measurements. Conclusion: We provide the workflow to build and use a micromanipulation apparatus with any inverted microscope to perform nucleus isolation, force measurements, and various other biophysical techniques. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12195-022-00734-y.

Indexed as

ChromatinForceLaminsMicropipetteSpring constant

Identifiers

PMID36119136
PMCPMC9474788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.