ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2022
Metronomic chemotherapy using oral cyclophosphamide and bevacizumab for recurrent cervical cancer: A multi-institutional retrospective study.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low-dose oral cyclophosphamide with or without bevacizumab treatment in patients with recurrent ovarian and cervical cancer before best supportive care.International cancer conference journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
No standard chemotherapy is available after disease progression or anaphylaxis during platinum chemotherapy among patients with recurrent cervical cancer. Here we report the efficacy and toxicities of metronomic chemotherapy consisting of 50 mg of oral cyclophosphamide (CPA) daily and intravenous 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab (BEV) repeated every 3 weeks (CPA-BEV). Treated patients were retrospectively reviewed. Adverse events and response rates were recorded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ver 5.0 and Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors ver 1.1, respectively. Eleven patients had been treated with CPA-BEV between 2016 and 2021.The pathologic types were squamous cell carcinoma in seven patients, adenocarcinoma in three, and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in one. Nine patients had primary concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Five patients received more than one prior chemotherapy (excluding CCRT). Six patients had progressive disease during prior platinum-based chemotherapy, four patients recurred within 6 months of the last platinum administration, and one patient had platinum anaphylaxis. Grade 3 or more hematologic toxicities and grade 2 or more non-hematological toxicities were observed in one with grade 3 neutropenia and in one with grade 2 proteinuria, respectively. The median duration of chemotherapy was 2.8 months (range 0.2-30.6 months). One patient had CR but none had PR. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95 %CI: 2.1-10.7 months), and median overall survival was 13.6 months (95 %CI: 8.4-33.7 months). In conclusion, the CPA-BEV regimen showed favorable antitumor activity with minimal toxicity and is promising candidate for second-line chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.