Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36118989›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2022

Clinical implementation of the first Cherenkov imaging system in a community-based hospital.

Erli Chen, Brian W Pogue, Petr Bruza, Daniel A Alexander, Nancy L Andino, Savannah M Decker, Danielle M Gaudet, David J Gladstone, Melinda J Lake, Steven R Levene and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Erli ChenCheshire Medical Center - Dartmouth Health.
Brian W PogueThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth.
Petr BruzaThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth.
Daniel A AlexanderThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth.
Nancy L AndinoCheshire Medical Center - Dartmouth Health.
Savannah M DeckerThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth.
Danielle M GaudetCheshire Medical Center - Dartmouth Health.
David J GladstoneThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth.
Melinda J LakeCheshire Medical Center - Dartmouth Health.
Steven R LeveneCheshire Medical Center - Dartmouth Health.
Jennifer L MichelsonCheshire Medical Center - Dartmouth Health.
Hila L RobinsonCheshire Medical Center - Dartmouth Health.
Debra N StallingsCheshire Medical Center - Dartmouth Health.
John E StarkeyCheshire Medical Center - Dartmouth Health.
Lesley A JarvisDartmouth Geisel School of Medicine.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Everyday Use of Optical Cherenkov Imaging Identifies Adverse Events and Opportunities for Improved Radiation TreatmentR44CA265654 · NCI · DOSEOPTICS, LLC · PI WARE, WILLIAM · 2021 to 2022
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R44 CA265654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To document experiences with one year of clinical implementation of the first Cherenkov imaging system and share the methods that we developed to utilize Cherenkov imaging to improve treatment delivery accuracy in real-time. Methods: A Cherenkov imaging system was installed commissioned and calibrated for clinical use. The optimal room lighting conditions and imaging setup protocols were developed to optimize both image quality and patient experience. The Cherenkov images were analyzed for treatment setup and beam delivery verification. Results: We have successfully implemented a clinical Cherenkov imaging system in a community-based hospital. Several radiation therapy patient setup anomalies were found in 1) exit dose to the contralateral breast, 2) dose to the chin due to head rotation for a supraclavicular field, 3) intrafractional patient motion during beam delivery, and 4) large variability (0.5 cm to 5 cm) in arm position between fractions. The system was used to deliver deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) treatment delivery of an electron treatment beam. Clinical process and procedures were improved to mitigate the identified issues to ensure treatment delivery safety and to improve treatment accuracy. Conclusion: The Cherenkov imaging system has proven to be a valuable clinical tool for the improvement of treatment delivery safety and accuracy at our hospital. With only minimal training the therapists were able to adjust or correct treatment positions during treatment delivery as needed. With future Cherenkov software developments Cherenkov imaging systems could provide daily surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) and real time treatment delivery quality control for all 3D and clinical setup patients without adding additional radiation image dose as in standard kV, MV and CBCT image verifications. Cherenkov imaging can greatly improve clinical efficiency and accuracy, making real time dose delivery consistency verification and SGRT a reality.

Identifiers

PMID36118989
PMCPMC9472078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.