Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36118941›Full record

ArticleChaos, solitons, and fractals2022

Dynamics diagnosis of the COVID-19 deaths using the Pearson diagram.

Alan D S Gonçalves, Leonardo H S Fernandes, Abraão D C Nascimento

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chaos, solitons, and fractals, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alan D S GonçalvesDepartamento de Estatssca, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, 50670-901, Brazil.
Leonardo H S FernandesDepartment of Economics and Informatics, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Serra Talhada, PE, 56909-535, Brazil.
Abraão D C NascimentoDepartamento de Estatssca, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, 50670-901, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pandemic COVID-19 brings with it the need for studies and tools to help those in charge make decisions. Working with classical time series methods such as ARIMA and SARIMA has shown promising results in the first studies of COVID-19. We advance in this branch by proposing a risk factor map induced by the well-known Pearson diagram based on multivariate kurtosis and skewness measures to analyze the dynamics of deaths from COVID-19. In particular, we combine bootstrap for time series with SARIMA modeling in a new paradigm to construct a map on which one can analyze the dynamics of a set of time series. The proposed map allows a risk analysis of multiple countries in the four different periods of the pandemic COVID-19 in 55 countries. Our empirical evidence suggests a direct relationship between the multivariate skewness and kurtosis. We observe that the multivariate kurtosis increase leads to the rise of the multivariate skewness. Our findings reveal that the countries with high risk from the behavior of the number of deaths tend to have pronounced skewness and kurtosis values.

Indexed as

BootstrapCOVID-19KurtosisPearson diagramSkewnessTime series

Identifiers

PMID36118941
PMCPMC9464589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.