ArticleJournal of blood medicine2022
Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Risks of Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms at Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital.
Article in Journal of blood medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Domain affiliated distilled knowledge transfer for improved convergence of Ph-negative MPN identifier.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph-MPNs) are clonal hematopoietic cell malignancy that comprises polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). They prone to develop thrombosis, bleeding, fibrotic progression, and leukemic transformation. We aimed to study clinical characteristics, thrombosis complications, and prognostic risk in Indonesians with Ph-MPNs. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cross-sectional study, including patients with Ph-MPNs who attended Hematology and Medical Oncology outpatient clinic at Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, between 2016 and 2021. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, previous antiplatelet treatment, baseline laboratory data, JAK2V617F mutation, and treatment were reviewed for analysis. The prognostic risk model was assessed for PV (IPSS), ET (IPSET-thrombosis), and PMF (IPSS and DIPPS) patients. Results: One hundred forty-six patients were classified as PV (31.5%), ET (38.4%), and PMF (30.1%) with median ages of 54, 53.5, and 55 years, respectively. PMF presented with the most diverse clinical presentations. JAK2V617 mutations were detected in 82%, 42.5%, and 76.5% of PV, ET, and PMF patients. PV had the highest thrombosis event pre/at diagnosis (26.1%), with predominantly arterial thrombosis. Bleeding occurred more in PMF (20.5%). Phlebotomy and hydroxyurea are the only treatment available for Ph-MPNs in the government hospital in Indonesia. IPSS intermediate risk in PV (47.8%), IPSET-thrombosis low risk in ET (46.4%), and IPSS and DIPSS intermediate-2 in PMF (38.6% and 50% respectively) were the most common risk groups. Conclusion: Essential thrombocythemia was the most prevalent Ph-MPNs in Indonesia. Arterial thrombosis was the highest thrombosis event pre/at diagnosis in PV despite IPSET-thrombosis low risk being the most common risk group. In JAK2V617 mutation-positive MPN population, thrombosis event was also the highest in PV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.