ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022
A new complex mental health test in a positive psychological framework.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Promoting healthy aging in occupational settings: satisfaction with life as a strategic target in the Semmelweis-EUniWell framework.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Perceived Academic Support and Mental Well-Being Among Vocational Education and Training (TVET) Trainees in Kenya: The Mediating Role of Academic Resilience.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Slovak adaptation of the psychological immune competence inventory (PICI).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Chinese college teachers' emotional intelligence and mental health: a chain mediation model involving student relationship quality.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- The spectral model of personal wellbeing and the validity of the Personal Wellbeing Spectral Questionnaire.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Mental health competencies are stronger determinants of well-being than mental disorder symptoms in both psychiatric and non-clinical samples.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Preliminary validation of the Mental Health Test in a psychiatric sample.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Psychological resilience and competence: key promoters of successful aging and flourishing in late life.GeroScience · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the Maintainable Positive Mental Health Theory (MPMHT), the main pillars of positive mental health are global well-being, efficient coping that enables an individual to maintain positive conditions and functioning, savoring capacity, resilience, and dynamic self-regulation. This study presents the validation of a new five-scale mental health test (MHT), the MHT that operationalizes MPMHT. The methodology comprised two online cross-sectional studies using self-report questionnaires. Participants in Study I (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.