Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36118487›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

A psychometric study of the Russian-language version of the "Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-third edition": An assessment of reliability and validity.

Polina Pavlova, Dmitry Maksimov, Dmitry Chegodaev, Sergey Kiselev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Polina PavlovaLaboratory for Brain and Neurocognitive Development, Department of Psychology, Ural Institute of Humanities, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia.
Dmitry MaksimovLaboratory for Brain and Neurocognitive Development, Department of Psychology, Ural Institute of Humanities, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia.
Dmitry ChegodaevLaboratory for Brain and Neurocognitive Development, Department of Psychology, Ural Institute of Humanities, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia.
Sergey KiselevLaboratory for Brain and Neurocognitive Development, Department of Psychology, Ural Institute of Humanities, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-third edition (Bayley-III) is one of the most widely used tools for assessing child development, and adapted versions of this instrument have been successfully used in many countries. No comprehensive psychometric studies of the Bayley-III have yet been performed in Russia. Materials and methods: This psychometric study was part of the longitudinal study conducted by the Ural Federal University in 2016-2020. Within the project, the original Bayley-III manual was translated into Russian and then used in a cohort of 333 infants to assess cognition, expressive/receptive communication, and fine/gross motor skills. For the purpose of psychometric analysis, we selected the data for four age groups of children from the longitudinal study database: 4-6 months ( Results: The average scaled scores of the examined children were generally comparable with the original (US) Bayley-III norms, with the exception of those older than 1 year, who demonstrated 1.2-1.9 points better performance in cognitive development and gross motor skills and 0.9-2.6 points lower performance in expressive communication. The correlation of both raw and scaled scores between different scales was low to moderate in all age groups (Spearman's ρ mostly within the range of 0.3-0.6; Conclusion: The Russian version of the Bayley-III proved to be a psychometrically valid and reliable tool for assessing child development, at least in a research context. The development of the examined children was close to the original US norms, with some deviation in cognitive, gross motor, and expressive communication scores mostly in older children, which could be attributed to the biased sample.

Indexed as

Bayley-IIIBayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Developmentchild developmentconfirmatory factor analysispsychometric study

Identifiers

PMID36118487
PMCPMC9478792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.