Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36118258›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2022

Canada's First Experience With a Patient-Adjudicated Cancer Research Grant Competition: A Case Study.

Ruth Ackerman, Don Desserud, Nathalie Baudais, Debi Lascelle, Kimberly Badovinac

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruth AckermanCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Don DesserudFaculty of Political Science, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
Nathalie BaudaisCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Debi LascelleCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kimberly BadovinacCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5339-0407

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although patient partners have been part of grant review panels, they are rarely given decision-making authority and never given sole responsibility for determining what research to fund. In patient-oriented research, however, patient partners may be in the best position to determine what is needed and whether the proposed research will engage patients in meaningful ways. The objective of this case study was to demonstrate that patient partners can adjudicate patient-oriented research proposals without the inclusion of researcher/expert reviewers.

Indexed as

cancercancer researchgrant adjudicationorganizational culturepatient engagementpatient feedbackpatient partners

Identifiers

PMID36118258
PMCPMC9478694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.