Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36118254›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Global use and outcomes of the hearWHO mHealth hearing test.

Karina C De Sousa, Cas Smits, David R Moore, Shelly Chada, Herman Myburgh, De Wet Swanepoel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Integrated digit-in-noise testing for hearing and cognitive screening.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An Application-Based Hearing Assessment Among Medical Students Using Personal Listening Devices in a Private Medical College in South Chennai.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Simplified cochlear frequency selectivity measure for sensorineural hearing loss screening: comparison with digit triplet test (DTT) and shortened speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) questionnaire.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Karina C De SousaDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1742-1613
Cas SmitsAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David R MooreCommunication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Childrens' Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Shelly ChadaDepartment of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Herman MyburghDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
De Wet SwanepoelDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
University of Pretoria · ZAAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USThe University of Western Australia · AUWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine the uptake, user characteristics, and performance of the free WHO smartphone hearing screening test ( Method: We retrospectively examined the data of 242 626 tests conducted by adults (> 18 years) on the Results: The Conclusions: Digital mhealth tools provide many benefits in healthcare, including health promotion, access to information, and services for hearing loss. The

Indexed as

apps personalized medicineconnected care personalized medicinedigital health generaleHealth generalinternet generalmHealth psychologyPublic health diseaseself-efficacy personalized medicinesmartphone media

Identifiers

PMID36118254
PMCPMC9478685
OpenAlexW4296327344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.