Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36118250›Full record

ArticleDrugs in context2022

The prognostic role of variations in tumour markers (CEA, CA15.3) in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Federico Sottotetti, Elisa Ferraris, Barbara Tagliaferri, Raffaella Palumbo, Erica Quaquarini, Cristina Teragni, Emanuela Balletti, Claudia Leli, Andrea Premoli, Ludovica Mollica and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs in context, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Federico SottotettiDivision of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Elisa FerrarisDivision of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Barbara TagliaferriDivision of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Raffaella PalumboDivision of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Erica QuaquariniDivision of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Cristina TeragniDivision of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Emanuela BallettiDivision of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Claudia LeliDivision of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Andrea PremoliDivision of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Ludovica MollicaDivision of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Silvia PuglisiDivision of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Silvia SardiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Alberto MaloviniLaboratory of Informatics and Systems Engineering for Clinical Research, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Paolo PedrazzoliDivision of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Antonio BernardoDivision of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumour markers have no established role in the monitoring of the course of metastatic breast cancer during antineoplastic therapy, yet cancer antigen 15.3 (CA15.3) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are commonly used in clinical practice to aid in the early detection of progression of disease (PD). In our multicentre, prospective, real-life study, we enrolled 142 consecutive patients with advanced breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor from January 2017 to October 2020; 75 patients had PD at the time of database closure. We measured serum marker concentrations at regular 4-month intervals together with radiological tumour response assessments and in cases of clinical suspicion of PD. Appropriate descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used to analyse serum marker level trends amongst prespecified subgroups and at specific time points (baseline, best radiologically documented tumour response and first detection of PD) in the subpopulation of patients with PD at the time of database closure. Notably, the median time from treatment initiation to best tumour response was 4.4 months. We evaluated the presence of an association between baseline CA15.3 and CEA levels and prespecified clinical characteristics but found no clinically meaningful correlation. We assessed marker level variations at the time of best radiologically documented disease response and PD: in the subgroup of patients who responded to treatment before progressing, we detected a statistically significant correlation with tumour marker variation between the time of best response and progression; this finding was not confirmed in the subgroup of patients that did not benefit from treatment. In conclusion, serum tumour marker flares can be useful in the early diagnosis of PD but should not be used as the sole factor prompting a change in treatment strategy without radiological confirmation.

Indexed as

breast cancerCDK4/6 inhibitorstumour markers

Identifiers

PMID36118250
PMCPMC9451191
OpenAlexW4293912949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.