ArticleSustainable production and consumption2021
Preventing a rebound in carbon intensity post-COVID-19 - lessons learned from the change in carbon intensity before and after the 2008 financial crisis.
Article in Sustainable production and consumption, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Driving China's Carbon Emissions after the COVID-19 Outbreak.Environmental science & technology · 2023Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on global trade-embodied carbon emissions.Journal of cleaner production · 2023Article
- What can we learn from the 2008 financial crisis for global power decarbonization after COVID-19?Fundamental research · 2023Article
- A nexus study of carbon emissions and financial development in China using the decoupling analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- The sources of the Kuznets relationship between the COVID-19 mortality rate and economic performance.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2022Article
- Does marine environmental research meet the challenges of marine pollution induced by the COVID-19 pandemic? Comparison analysis before and during the pandemic based on bibliometrics.Marine pollution bulletin · 2022Article
- The COVID-19 pandemic reshapes the plastic pollution research - A comparative analysis of plastic pollution research before and during the pandemic.Environmental research · 2022Article
- An impact study of COVID-19 on the electricity sector: A comprehensive literature review and Ibero-American survey.Renewable & sustainable energy reviews · 2022Review
- Implications of COVID-19 on global environmental pollution and carbon emissions with strategies for sustainability in the COVID-19 era.The Science of the total environment · 2022Review
- Drivers of COInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Analyzing driving forces of China's carbon emissions from 1997 to 2040 and the potential emission reduction path: through decomposition and scenario analysis.Clean technologies and environmental policy · 2022Article
- The impact of artificial intelligence and digital style on industry and energy post-COVID-19 pandemic.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Review
- Integrating Digital Technologies and Public Health to Fight Covid-19 Pandemic: Key Technologies, Applications, Challenges and Outlook of Digital Healthcare.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Difference and Cluster Analysis on the Carbon Dioxide Emissions in China During COVID-19 Lockdown via a Complex Network Model.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The carbon emission rebound of the post-2008 financial crisis teaches us a lesson that avoiding a rebound in carbon intensity is key to prevent the carbon emission increase afterward. Although how carbon emission will change the world after the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown, it is urgent to learn from the past and avert or slow down the potential rebound effect. Therefore, this study aims to identify key drivers of carbon intensity changes of 55 sectors, applying the decomposition techniques and the world input-output data. Our results demonstrate that global carbon intensity fluctuates drastically when shocked by the global financial crisis, presenting an inversed-V shape for the period 2008-2011. Industrial carbon emission and gross output vary among different industries, the growth rate of industrial carbon intensity varies from -55.55% to 23.77%. The energy intensity effect and economic structure effect have opposite impacts on carbon intensity decrease, accelerating and hindering the decreasing carbon intensity, respectively. However, the energy mix effect has a minor impact on carbon intensity decrease. The industrial carbon intensity decomposition results show the impact of technological and structural factors are significantly different among industries. Moreover, the impact of energy intensity is slightly stronger than the energy mix. More measures targeting avoiding the rebound in carbon intensity should be developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.