ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Tooth decalcification: A correlation between weight loss in a decalcified tooth with different decalcifying agents.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Assessment of Five Decalcification Methods for Human Dental Tissue: An Ex Vivo Laboratory Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The histopathological examination of mineralized tissues requires decalcification of teeth which is an essential and important step during tissue processing. In the present study we attempted to decalcify teeth using strong and weak acids and a chelating agent with various methods to identify completion of decalcification along with the observance of weight loss percentage of a tooth. Aim: To compare decalcification with conventional decalcification method with strong acid, weak acids and a chelating agent with respect to preservation of tissue structure, efficacy of staining in association with weight change. Materials and methods: A total of 64 multi-rooted and single rooted teeth were used, with group of 16 teeth, (16 molars, 16 pre-molars, 16 canines and 16 incisors) for each of the solution as Chelating agent (10% EDTA), Strong acid(10%HNO Results: At 70-80% of weight change of a tooth decalcification is complete. 10% EDTA was best suited to the soft and hard tissues in comparison to other solutions. 5% TCA was fair in staining quality and maintenance of hard tissue structures was satisfactory to 10%HNO Conclusion: The final impression led to the proposition that EDTA was indeed the best decalcifying agent available if the results required are not urgent. For situations where time constraint is there, 5% Tri Carboxylic Acid can be used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.