Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36118057›Full record

ReviewRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT

Burnout syndrome in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.

Vinicius S T Meira-Silva, Anna Cecilia T N Freire, Danielle P Zinezzi, Fernanda C R Ribeiro, Georgia D Coutinho, Isabela M B Lima, Isabella C Crispi, Juliana D Porto, Laís G P Silva, Luiz Henrique A Miranda and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vinicius S T Meira-SilvaUniversidade Estácio de Sá - Centro I Presidente Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3271-0811
Anna Cecilia T N FreireUniversidade Estácio de Sá - Centro I Presidente Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Danielle P ZinezziUniversidade Estácio de Sá - Centro I Presidente Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Fernanda C R RibeiroUniversidade Estácio de Sá - Centro I Presidente Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Georgia D CoutinhoUniversidade Estácio de Sá - Centro I Presidente Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Isabela M B LimaUniversidade Estácio de Sá - Centro I Presidente Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Isabella C CrispiUniversidade Estácio de Sá - Centro I Presidente Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Juliana D PortoUniversidade Estácio de Sá - Centro I Presidente Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Laís G P SilvaUniversidade Estácio de Sá - Centro I Presidente Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Luiz Henrique A MirandaUniversidade Estácio de Sá - Centro I Presidente Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Maria Giullia F ZuritaUniversidade Estácio de Sá - Centro I Presidente Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Victor Hugo R BeleriqueUniversidade Estácio de Sá - Centro I Presidente Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Yasmin T BandoliUniversidade Estácio de Sá - Centro I Presidente Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Fundação Getulio Vargas · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is evidence that harm to the mental health of healthcare workers has occurred during the pandemic caused by COVID-19. The burnout syndrome is a form of exhaustion that occurs in occupational settings and is a condition caused by long-term stress in the workplace. The objectives of this systematic review of observational studies were to present data from research into the prevalence of burnout syndrome in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and observe its prevalence among frontline workers. The search was conducted on the MEDLINE, LILACS, and Embase databases from 2019 to May of 2021 and returned 538 publications, which underwent a two-stage process of selection by independent peers, resulting in selection of a sample of 29 articles. Data were then extracted and synthesized for presentation in narrative form. Cross-sectional designs were more prevalent (n = 26) than longitudinal studies (n = 3). The sample included research from 19 different countries, with one Brazilian study. A wide range of different instruments were administered by study authors to assess burnout syndrome, the most common of which was the Maslach Burnout Inventory (n = 13). The prevalence of burnout syndrome in the studies varied from 76 to 14.7%. Data on the relationship between development of burnout syndrome and working on the frontline were controversial. The lack of standardization of burnout syndrome assessment was a source of considerable difficulty, compromising comparability of the results, and should therefore be targeted for improvement by researchers. We suggest that more investigations should be conducted into prevalence and the associated factors of risk and protection.

Indexed as

COVID-19healthcare personneloccupational healthpandemicsprofessional burnout

Identifiers

PMID36118057
PMCPMC9444214
OpenAlexW4285207438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.