ArticleChinese herbal medicines2022
Article in Chinese herbal medicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- TCMToxDB: a comprehensive database for the toxicological analysis of traditional Chinese medicines.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
- Stir-fried Semen Armeniacae Amarum Suppresses Aristolochic Acid I-Induced Nephrotoxicity and DNA Adducts.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2025Article
- Unveiling correlations between aristolochic acids and liver cancer: spatiotemporal heterogeneity phenomenon.Chinese medicine · 2024Review
- No Incidence of Liver Cancer Was Observed in A Retrospective Study of Patients with Aristolochic Acid Nephropathy.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2024Article
- TCMSTD 1.0: a systematic analysis of the traditional Chinese medicine system toxicology database.Science China. Life sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Although some studies have linked Methods: A retrospective cohort study among hepatitis B virus (HBV)-monoinfected patients and non-HBV-monoinfected patients were performed. Patients over 18 years of age were eligible for inclusion. Prescription records of inpatients and outpatients were inquired to distinguish Results: There were 49 500 HBV and 133 148 non-HBV patients involved in the two cohorts. Among HBV patients (2 901 users; 46 599 nonusers), the prevalence of HCC in Conclusion: An obvious irrelevancy was found between the consumption of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.