Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36117971›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Moderate sedation by total intravenous remimazolam-alfentanil vs. propofol-alfentanil for third molar extraction: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Nan Zhao, Jie Zeng, Lin Fan, Jing Wang, Chao Zhang, SiHai Zou, Bi Zhang, Kai Li, Cong Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. The median effective dose (EDBMC anesthesiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in sedation dentistry: a scoping review.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nan ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stomatology Hospital Affiliated Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jie ZengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stomatology Hospital Affiliated Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Lin FanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stomatology Hospital Affiliated Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stomatology Hospital Affiliated Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chao ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stomatology Hospital Affiliated Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
SiHai ZouChongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Bi ZhangChongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Kai LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stomatology Hospital Affiliated Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Cong YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stomatology Hospital Affiliated Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNChongqing Medical University · CNStomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNStomatology Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oral dental treatment cause anxiety, fear, and physical stress. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of moderate sedation by remimazolam with alfentanil vs. propofol with alfentanil in third molar extraction. Methods: This single-center, randomized, single-blind clinical trial included 100 adults who underwent third molar ambulatory extraction. All patients had continuous infusion of Alfentanil 0.2 μg/kg/min. Group remimazolam with alfentanil (group RA) had an induction dose of 80 μg/kg and maintenance dosage of 5 μg/kg/min. In group propofol with alfentanil (PA group), propofol was infused at an initial concentration of 1.8 μg/mL under target controlled infusion (TCI) mode and a maintenance concentration of 1.5 μg/mL. The incidence rates of adverse effects were recorded and compared. Depth of sedation was assessed using the modified observer alertness/sedation assessment (MOAA/S) and entropy index. Recovery characteristics were recorded and complications observed for next 24 h. Results: The incident of adverse events 6 (12%) in the group RA was lower than the group PA 25 (50%) [Mean difference 0.136 (95%CI, 0.049-0.377); Conclusions: Remimazolam with alfentanil is a safer and more effective alternative for ambulatory sedation and can reduce recovery and discharge time and the incidence of perioperative adverse events compare with propofol. Clinical trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx, identifier: ChiCTR2200058106.

Indexed as

alfentanilpropofolremimazolamsedationthird molar

Identifiers

PMID36117971
PMCPMC9479102
OpenAlexW4294219223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.