Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36117967›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Frequency and gender differences in the use of professional home care in late life. Findings from three German old-age cohorts.

Elżbieta W Buczak-Stec, André Hajek, Alexander Pabst, Christian Brettschneider, Hendrik van den Bussche, Birgitt Wiese, Siegfried Weyerer, Jochen Werle, Andreas Hoell, Michael Pentzek and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Elżbieta W Buczak-StecDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
André HajekDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Alexander PabstInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian BrettschneiderDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Hendrik van den BusscheDepartment of General Practice and Primary Medical Care, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Birgitt WieseInstitute of General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Siegfried WeyererCentral Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Jochen WerleCentral Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Andreas HoellCentral Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Michael PentzekInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Angela FuchsInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Melanie LuppaInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Margit LöbnerInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Janine SteinInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Franziska FörsterInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Dagmar WeegDepartment of Psychiatry, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Edelgard MöschDepartment of Psychiatry, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Kathrin HeserDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Martin SchererDepartment of General Practice and Primary Medical Care, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Wolfgang MaierDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Matthias C AngermeyerCenter for Public Mental Health, Gösing am Wagram, Austria.
Michael WagnerDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Steffi G Riedel-HellerInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Hans-Helmut KönigDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEUniversität Hamburg · DECentral Institute of Mental Health · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of and the gender differences in the use of professional home care in Germany. Methods: We used harmonized data from three large cohort studies from Germany ("Healthy Aging: Gender-specific trajectories into the latest life"; AgeDifferent.de Platform). Data were available for 5,393 older individuals (75 years and older). Mean age was 80.2 years (SD: 4.1 years), 66.6% were female. Professional homecare outcome variables were use of outpatient nursing care, paid household assistance, and meals on wheels' services. Logistic regression models were used, adjusting for important sociodemographic variables. Results: Altogether 5.2% of older individuals used outpatient nursing care (6.2% women and 3.2% men; Conclusions: Our study showed that gender differences exist in using paid household assistance and in culinary dependency. For example, meals on wheels' services are of great importance (e.g., for individuals living alone or for individuals with low social support). Gender differences were not identified regarding outpatient nursing care. Use of professional home care services may contribute to maintaining autonomy and independence in old age.

Indexed as

gender differenceshealthcare utilizationhome-based formal helphome caremeals on wheelsoutpatient nursing careprofessional home care

Identifiers

PMID36117967
PMCPMC9478461
OpenAlexW4294204415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.