Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36117873›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression and HbA1c in Patients with Depression and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yanshang Wang, Mingzheng Hu, Dawei Zhu, Ruoxi Ding, Ping He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanshang WangSchool of Public Health, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6110-6296
Mingzheng HuSchool of Public Health, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.
Dawei ZhuChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.
Ruoxi DingChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.
Ping HeChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-0040-5012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: The collaborative care (CC) is emerging as an effective method in treating patients with multimorbidity, but evidence whether this model is effective for people with comorbid depression and diabetes is unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether CC could improve depression outcomes and HbA1c in patients with depressive symptoms and diabetes, and assess its effects on Quality of Life (QoL). Method: The author searched Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, PsycINFO and CINAHL to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs published up to October 21, 2020. Studies were required to assess CC in patients with depressive symptoms and diabetes. The primary outcomes were depression treatment response rate and HbA1c and secondary outcome was Quality of Life (QoL). Available individual patient data was collected from all eligible studies. Studies were independently screened by two reviewers and critically appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, and the fixed effects and random effects model were used to pool Relative Risks (RRs) and Standard Mean Differences (SMDs). Results: Our research identified 7906 articles, and finally 12 RCTs were included. Study sample sizes ranged from 58 to 417. The total follow-up period ranged from 12 weeks to 24 months. At follow-up, depression treatment response rate had a significant increase (RR = 1·31, 95% CI 1·23 to 1·39, I Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis supported the effectiveness of CC in reducing depression and improving QoL in people with comorbid depression and diabetes.

Indexed as

collaborative caredepressive symptomsdiabetesmeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID36117873
PMCPMC9438466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.