ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Surgical management of tuberculum sellae meningioma: Transcranial approach or endoscopic endonasal approach?
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Anterior Midline Skull Base Meningiomas: A Systematic Review of Resection Rates, Functional Outcomes, and Perioperative Complications Following Contemporary Endoscopic Endonasal Versus Transcranial Approaches.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Are Routine Lumbar Drains Necessary for Endoscopic Reconstruction after Resection of Anterior and Central Skull Base Tumors?Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026Article
- Visual outcomes following endoscopic endonasal approach for tuberculum sellae meningiomas a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Use of three-dimensional-printed models for preoperative planning in endoscopic endonasal surgery for tuberculum sellae meningioma: A case report and literature review.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Surgical strategy to minimize dominant hemisphere retraction in an asymmetric giant tuberculum sellae meningioma with contralateral anterior cerebral artery positioning: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Exploring efficacy: A comprehensive review of extended transsphenoidal approach in anterior skull base meningiomas.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Assessing chiasm perfusion and postoperative visual function with superior hypophyseal artery indocyanine green angiograms during endoscopic endonasal surgery.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Meningioma: International Consortium on Meningiomas consensus review on scientific advances and treatment paradigms for clinicians, researchers, and patients.Neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Comparative Efficacy of Transsphenoidal and Transcranial Approaches for Treating Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Surgical treatment of tuberculum sellae meningioma: A retrospective review of single institutional experience.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
- Clinical Profile of Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas Based on Scoring System: An Institutional Experience in Indonesia.Cancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM), a common benign tumor in the sellae region, usually causes neurological deficits, such as vision impairment, by squeezing the peripheral neurovascular structures. Surgical management is recommended as the optimal strategy for TSM treatment and vision restoration. However, it remains challenging to resect TSM in the traditional transcranial approach (TCA). Recently, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has emerged as an effective option in skull base surgeries. Besides the effectivity, the advantages and limitations of EEA in TSM surgery remain controversial. Object: We compared the surgical outcomes and complications between TCA and EEA surgeries to identify the principles in TSM surgical management. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on the patients, who underwent TSM surgery in Wuhan Union Hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. The patients were assigned to TCA or EEA group according to the surgery they experienced. All patients were analyzed with the extent of tumor resection, vision outcome, postoperative complications, and follow-up results. Results: A total of 112 patients were enrolled in this study, including 78 in TCA group and 34 in EEA group. The mean follow-up was 20.5 months (range 3-36 months). There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographic data, preoperative symptoms, and tumor characteristics between TCA and EEA groups. Both TCA and EEA surgeries are effective in TSM resection with relatively high gross total resection rates (85.9% in TCA vs. 91.2% in EEA, Conclusion: Both TCA and EEA surgeries are effective in TSM resection. EEA surgery has a better outcome in vision restoration or stabilization than TCA surgery, but induces higher risk of CSF leakage. As each approach has unique advantages and limitations, we must take all aspects into consideration, including approach feathers, tumor characteristics, and clinical requirements, to make the optimal choice in TSM surgical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.