ArticleUrology annals
Detection of renal anomalies using antenatal and postnatal ultrasound: The consanguinity factor.
Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case report of congenital anterior urethral diverticulum: Is parental consanguinity a possible risk factor?Urology case reports · 2026Article
- Neonatal Renal Ultrasound Reference Values in Romanian Term Newborns: Correlations with Anthropometric Characteristics.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Antenatal ultrasound (US) is considered the gold standard tool to detect fetal anomalies during the antenatal period. However, its highly operator dependent and maybe affected with other variables. The aim of this study to compare discrepancy between antenatal and postnatal US diagnosis of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) and to evaluate the incidence of parent's consanguinity among those patients at King Abdulaziz Medical City - Western Region (KAMC-WR), as it may help changing the current practiced guidelines and applied protocols. Methods: This is an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study, conducted at the Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit at KAMC-WR, reviewing antenatally detected CAKUT between the years 2009 and 2014. Utilizing the congenital anomalies database and using multiple databases collected the data. A data sheet was completed and divided into four sections, which consist of maternal data, antenatal data, delivery, and postnatal data. The analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences program (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Results: We included 137 fetuses with renal anomalies in our study, with 17% perinatal mortality rate, and 13% loss of follow-up. Abnormal amniotic fluid was detected in 32%, and bilateral anomalies presented in 41% and it was most commonly seen in male fetuses. Added to that, 41% of the fetuses were product of consanguineous marriage and 11% had a history of other child with renal anomalies. However, the rate of discrepancy between antenatal and postnatal renal US findings was 24%. Finally, the most common anomaly found antenatally and confirmed postnatally was hydronephrosis disease spectrum (60.6%). Conclusion: There is a significant association between children with CAKUT and parents' consanguinity. Furthermore, the discrepancy rate for the detection of CAKUT between antenatal and postnatal US in our study was comparable to other international studies. Further prospective studies are recommended in this field for further understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.