Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36117774›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on emerging topics in computing

Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning NLP Models for Cancer Registries.

Mohammed Alawad, Hong-Jun Yoon, Shang Gao, Brent Mumphrey, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Eric B Durbin, Jong Cheol Jeong, Isaac Hands, David Rust, Linda Coyle and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on emerging topics in computing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammed AlawadComputational Sciences and Engineering Division, Health Data Sciences Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831.
Hong-Jun YoonComputational Sciences and Engineering Division, Health Data Sciences Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831.
Shang GaoComputational Sciences and Engineering Division, Health Data Sciences Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831.
Brent MumphreyLouisiana Tumor Registry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Public Health, New Orleans, LA, 70112.
Xiao-Cheng WuLouisiana Tumor Registry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Public Health, New Orleans, LA, 70112.
Eric B DurbinKentucky Cancer Registry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506.; Division of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506.; Cancer Research Informatics Shared Resource Facility, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506.
Jong Cheol JeongDivision of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506.; Cancer Research Informatics Shared Resource Facility, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506.
Isaac HandsKentucky Cancer Registry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506.; Cancer Research Informatics Shared Resource Facility, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506.
David RustKentucky Cancer Registry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506.
Linda CoyleInformation Management Services Inc, Calverton, MD, 20705.
Lynne PenberthySurveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Georgia TourassiComputational Sciences and Engineering Division, Health Data Sciences Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · USUniversity of Kentucky · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USInformation Management Services · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KATHLEEN L. O'CONNOR · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800013INCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population cancer registries can benefit from Deep Learning (DL) to automatically extract cancer characteristics from the high volume of unstructured pathology text reports they process annually. The success of DL to tackle this and other real-world problems is proportional to the availability of large labeled datasets for model training. Although collaboration among cancer registries is essential to fully exploit the promise of DL, privacy and confidentiality concerns are main obstacles for data sharing across cancer registries. Moreover, DL for natural language processing (NLP) requires sharing a vocabulary dictionary for the embedding layer which may contain patient identifiers. Thus, even distributing the trained models across cancer registries causes a privacy violation issue. In this paper, we propose DL NLP model distribution via privacy-preserving transfer learning approaches without sharing sensitive data. These approaches are used to distribute a multitask convolutional neural network (MT-CNN) NLP model among cancer registries. The model is trained to extract six key cancer characteristics - tumor site, subsite, laterality, behavior, histology, and grade - from cancer pathology reports. Using 410,064 pathology documents from two cancer registries, we compare our proposed approach to conventional transfer learning without privacy-preserving, single-registry models, and a model trained on centrally hosted data. The results show that transfer learning approaches including data sharing and model distribution outperform significantly the single-registry model. In addition, the best performing privacy-preserving model distribution approach achieves statistically indistinguishable average micro- and macro-F1 scores across all extraction tasks (0.823,0.580) as compared to the centralized model (0.827,0.585).

Indexed as

cancer pathology reportsinformation extractionmulti-task CNNNLPPrivacy-preservingtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID36117774
PMCPMC9481201
OpenAlexW3016564562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.