Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36117766›Full record

ReviewChinese herbal medicines2021

Challenges and strategies in progress of drug delivery system for traditional Chinese medicine

Ruo-Ning Wang, Hua-Cong Zhao, Jian-Yu Huang, Hong-Lan Wang, Jun-Song Li, Yin Lu, Liu-Qing Di

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chinese herbal medicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cardiovascular Benefits ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Drug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chinese herbal medicines · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Polysaccharide fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ruo-Ning WangSchool of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China.
Hua-Cong ZhaoSchool of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China.
Jian-Yu HuangSchool of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China.
Hong-Lan WangSchool of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China.
Jun-Song LiSchool of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China.
Yin LuSchool of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China.
Liu-Qing DiSchool of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China.
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs), with a history of thousands of years, are widely used clinically with effective treatment. However, the drug delivery systems (DDSs) for TCMs remains major challenges due to the characteristics of multi-components including alkaloids, flavones, anthraquinones, glycosides, proteins, volatile oils and other types. Therefore, the novel preparations and technology of modern pharmaceutics is introduced to improve TCM therapeutic effects due to instability and low bioavailability of active ingredients.

Indexed as

active ingredientschallenges and strategiesdrug delivery systemsSalviae Miltiorrhizae Radix et RhizomaSalvia miltiorrhiza Bungetraditional Chinese medicines

Identifiers

PMID36117766
PMCPMC9476708
OpenAlexW3104446128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.