Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36117666›Full record

ArticleChinese herbal medicines2022

Preparation and pharmacokinetics

Yingying Huang, Lihua Xu, Fangping Zhang, Yang Liu, Yunyu Wang, Fangfeng Meng, Shuang Li, Xintao Cheng, Yuefeng Bi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese herbal medicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Recent nanoengineered therapeutic advancements in sepsis management.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yingying HuangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Lihua XuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Fangping ZhangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Yang LiuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Yunyu WangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Fangfeng MengSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Shuang LiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Xintao ChengSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Yuefeng BiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The current investigation aimed to determine the appropriate dosage form by comparing solid dispersion and liposome to achieve the purpose of improving the solubility and bioavailability of linarin. Methods: Linarin solid dispersion (LSD) and linarin liposome (LL) were developed via the solvent method and the thin film hydration method respectively. The Transwell chamber model of Caco-2 cells was established to evaluate the absorption of drug. The pharmacokinetics of linarin Results: The solubility of LSD and LL was severally 3.29 times and 3.09 times than that of linarin. The permeation coefficients of LSD and LL were greater than 10 Conclusion: The linarin was more suitable for making solid dispersion to enhance its solubility and bioavailability.

Indexed as

bioavailabilitintestinal absorptionlinarinliposomepharmacokineticssolid dispersion

Identifiers

PMID36117666
PMCPMC9476784
OpenAlexW4224144263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.