ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
E2SGAN: EEG-to-SEEG translation with generative adversarial networks.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI enabled decision support systems in epilepsy surgery a scoping review.Research square · 2026Article
- Inferring neural sources from electroencephalography: foundations and frontiers.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Review
- Addressing class imbalance in traumatic brain injury prognostication: A survey of resampling approaches.AIMS neuroscience · 2026Review
- Deep learning enabled decision support systems in epilepsy surgery: a scoping review.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Predicting spiking activity from scalp EEG.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- On the role of generative artificial intelligence in the development of brain-computer interfaces.BMC biomedical engineering · 2024Review
- Electroencephalographic Signal Data Augmentation Based on Improved Generative Adversarial Network.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- The increasing instance of negative emotion reduce the performance of emotion recognition.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-quality brain signal data recorded by Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrodes provide clinicians with clear guidance for presurgical assessments for epilepsy surgeries. SEEG, however, is limited to selected patients with epilepsy due to its invasive procedure. In this work, a brain signal synthesis framework is presented to synthesize SEEG signals from non-invasive EEG signals. First, a strategy to determine the matching relation between EEG and SEEG channels is presented by considering both signal correlation and spatial distance. Second, the EEG-to-SEEG generative adversarial network (E2SGAN) is proposed to precisely synthesize SEEG data from the simultaneous EEG data. Although the widely adopted magnitude spectra has proved to be informative in EEG tasks, it leaves much to be desired in the setting of signal synthesis. To this end, instantaneous frequency spectra is introduced to further represent the alignment of the signal. Correlative spectral attention (CSA) is proposed to enhance the discriminator of E2SGAN by capturing the correlation between each pair of EEG and SEEG frequencies. The weighted patch prediction (WPP) technique is devised to ensure robust temporal results. Comparison experiments on real-patient data demonstrate that E2SGAN outperforms baseline methods in both temporal and frequency domains. The perturbation experiment reveals that the synthesized results have the potential to capture abnormal discharges in epileptic patients before seizures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.